What the Micro-Fertiliser Industry Wants from Budget 2026
As India’s Union Budget for 2026 approaches, a key slice of the agriculture sector is putting forward its wishlist. The Indian Micro-Fertiliser Manufacturers Association (IMMA) has requested that the government implement several tax and policy changes to support businesses that manufacture micro-fertilisers. These proposals aim to simplify taxes, enhance cash flow, and foster a more streamlined regulatory environment. What they’re asking for isn’t just about easing costs. It’s about helping manufacturers grow, operate more efficiently, and ultimately serve farmers better.
Why Micro-Fertilisers Matter
Micro-fertilisers are specialised plant nutrients used in smaller quantities than traditional fertilisers. They can have a big impact on crop health, soil quality, and yields when used correctly. In a country where agriculture supports millions of farmers and contributes a major share of the economy, anything that enhances productivity matters. Yet the businesses that manufacture these products face their own challenges, especially when it comes to taxes and regulations.
The GST Situation: A Patchwork of Rates
One of the biggest issues the industry has highlighted is the inconsistency in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on fertilisers. Under the newer GST 2.0 reforms, a large number of fertiliser products saw their GST rate cut from 12 per cent to 5 per cent. That’s generally good news. But not all fertiliser products fall under this uniform bracket. Some still attract higher GST on raw materials or specific inputs than on the finished fertiliser itself. This creates what’s known as an inverted duty structure.
An inverted duty structure means manufacturers pay more tax on the inputs they buy than on the product they sell. The result is a buildup of “input tax credit” (the tax they’ve already paid). Businesses then have to wait for refunds on that credit. But delays in processing these refunds tie up capital that could otherwise go into expanding quality, boosting production, or reaching more farmers.
To fix this, IMMA wants the government to extend the 5 per cent GST rate across all fertilisers listed under the Fertiliser Control Order (FCO). Having a single GST rate for all these products would level the playing field, reduce confusion, and remove competitive disadvantages caused by different tax categories. It would also cut down disputes about how products are classified for tax purposes.
Faster GST Refunds: More Predictable Cash Flow
Another major request is to speed up refunds of excess GST credits. Right now, manufacturers often wait a long time to get refunds on the tax they have already paid, which locks up working capital. For smaller or medium-sized manufacturers, especially, this can be a serious cash-flow problem.
IMMA is calling for a clear, time-bound mechanism that would make the refund process faster and more predictable. From the industry’s point of view, quicker refunds would directly ease financial pressure. Instead of applying working capital to carry tax credits on the books, manufacturers could use it to improve product quality, expand operations, or invest in farmer outreach programs.
One Nation, One Licence: Reducing Red Tape
Beyond GST, the industry’s recommendations include simplifying licensing. At the moment, companies have to navigate different requirements for different states — and in some cases, even district-level differences. That leads to duplicated efforts, longer approval times, and higher compliance costs.
IMMA wants a “One Nation, One Licence” system, backed by a centralised digital repository for all licence-related documents. The idea is to make licenses easier to issue and verify, irrespective of where a manufacturer wants to sell their products. Under this approach, states and regulators could access a shared database, speeding up approvals and reducing administrative hurdles.
This change would bring several benefits. First, it would cut down the time and money companies spend on multiple state-level processes. Second, it would make compliance smoother, especially for businesses operating at a national scale. And third, it could mean faster access to products for farmers, since administrative delays would be reduced.
Framing the Budget Discussion
IMMA isn’t alone in offering suggestions as the government prepares its budget. Ahead of Budget 2026, various industry groups and experts have shared recommendations on everything from tax reforms to spending priorities. Tax experts have weighed in on other aspects of the tax system, including personal tax rates and wealth taxation. Other associations are pushing for tax and credit relief for small and medium enterprises. These inputs reflect broader concerns about how taxes and regulations impact business growth and cash flow in different sectors of the economy.
Whatever form the final budget takes, it’s clear that stakeholders are focused on creating a predictable, level fiscal environment. The agricultural and allied sectors, in particular, see reforms around GST and licensing as key to unlocking growth and innovation.
What These Changes Could Mean on the Ground
If the government decides to move forward with these suggested updates, the impacts would probably be felt at all points in how things are made and supplied. When tax rules are made easier to understand and more consistent, companies making things will worry less about how their items are labelled and following the rules, plus getting back money from the Goods and Services Tax faster would ease money problems, freeing up funds to reinvest in expanding their businesses and coming up with new ideas.
Creating one central way to get licenses could also cut down on delays from paperwork and help companies get into more kinds of businesses. In the future, these changes could also help farmers by making it easier to get better micro-fertilisers for less money, which would help them grow more crops and keep their soil in better shape.
